NMFS proposes to specify a 2016 limit of 2,000 metric tons (mt) of longline-caught bigeye tuna for each U.S. Pacific territory (American Samoa, Guam, and the Northern Mariana Islands). NMFS would allow each territory to allocate up to 1,000 mt each year to U.S. longline fishing vessels in a specified fishing agreement that meets established criteria. As an accountability measure, NMFS would monitor, attribute, and restrict (if necessary) catches of longline-caught bigeye tuna, including catches made under a specified fishing agreement. The proposed catch limits and accountability measures support the long-term sustainability of fishery resources of the U.S. Pacific Islands. Although NMFS does not expect the specifications to have potential significant impacts on protected species, we consider information about potential effects in the EA.
Since the 2015 EA and FONSI, NMFS received new information that could influence the environmental effects analysis in the 2015 EA and FONSI. Specifically, the Hawaii-deep set longline fishery exceeded the incidental take statements for green sea turtles, olive ridley sea turtles and the North Pacific loggerhead sea turtle distinct population segment authorized in a NMFS 2014 Biological Opinion. Additionally, on April 6, 2016, NMFS and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service listed 11 distinct population segments of green sea turtle under the Endangered Species Act. NMFS will also address performance of the Hawaii deep-set longline fishery in 2015, and review scientific evaluations of the effects of two conservation and management measures agreed by the Western and Central Pacific Fisheries Commission on the status of bigeye tuna. Finally, NMFS will address recent interactions between the Hawaii shallow-set pelagic longline fishery and pinnipeds. NMFS will supplement the 2015 EA to help determine whether, in light of this new information, the Hawaii-deep set longline fishery operating under the proposed action in 2016 would result in significant environmental impacts to the human environment. The supplemental EA does not re-evaluate the effects of the proposed action on the longline fisheries in the three U.S. territories because there is no change expected to these fisheries and, therefore, the effects analysis in the 2015 EA remains valid for territory longline fisheries. NMFS does not anticipate any significant effect on the quality of the human environment from this action. NMFS will make a final determination after considering public comments.